1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Details of the disposition

The plaintiff is currently a student in the second year of D High School.

From November 18, 2016 to February 8, 2017, the Autonomous Committee on Countermeasures against School Violence in the E High School held a meeting on March 29, 2017 and decided that four of the nine students, among the aforesaid nine students, were to request each principal to take measures under Article 17 of the former Act on the Prevention of and Countermeasures against School Violence (amended by Act No. 1504, Nov. 28, 2017; hereinafter referred to as the “Act”), and that the remaining five students, including the Plaintiff, were not subject to measures.

On April 13, 2017, a victim student filed a petition for reexamination with the defendant on the basis of Article 17-2(1) of the Act, and the defendant decided on May 30, 2017 that the Autonomous Committee on Countermeasures against School Violence in E High Schools did not take any measure, and decided on May 30, 2017 that the above five persons request written apology and measures to the principal

(hereinafter “instant decision on reexamination.” The Plaintiff filed an administrative appeal seeking the revocation of the instant decision on reexamination, and the Central Adjudication Committee dismissed the Plaintiff’s claim on January 16, 2018.

【인정근거】 다툼 없는 사실, 갑 제1~4호증, 을 제1, 2호증의 각 기재 및 변론 전체의 취지 원고의 주장 원고는 다른 가해학생이 G에 피해학생에 대하여 쓴 글에 ‘이름 언급하면 큰일 날 것 같은데’, ‘그래야 할 것 같아 ㅂㄷㅂㄷ’, ‘ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ’ 등의 댓글을 달았을 뿐인데, 이 사건 재심결정이 확정되면 원고는 체육특기생으로 대학에 진학할 수 없게 되므로, 이 사건 재심결정은 원고의 행위에 비하여 지나치게 가혹하여 부당하다.

It shall be as shown in the attached Form of the relevant statutes.

The defendant's argument about the main defense is that the retrial decision of this case is made.