1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff is a student attending the third year of D High School located in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

B. On March 22, 2017, when the Plaintiff was in the second grade of D High School, F (hereinafter “victim students”) who was in the second grade of E High School located in Yangcheon-gu Seoul, Yangcheon-gu, Seoul, hereinafter “Plaintiffs and G High School students who were in the second grade of G High School located in Gangseo-gu, Seoul.”

Section B. February 25, 2017 and the same year

3. 9.2 times, while drinking alcohol at the head of Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan City and other village, and singing at nearby singing rooms, H had sexual intercourse with a victim and toilet whose consciousness of drinking is unclear; I, among aggressor students, photographed and distributed it to others by video; and the rest of aggressor students, including the Plaintiff, were aware of the fact and concealed or neglected it;

It received a report on the damage of school violence with contents such as "."

C. On April 7, 2017, the Joint Committee for Countermeasures against School Violence, which consists of the E High Schools, D High Schools, and G High Schools’ Autonomous Committee for Countermeasures against School Violence, shall be held on April 7, 2017, and shall be referred to as the “Act on the Prevention of and Countermeasures against School Violence” with respect to

(A) written apologys (No. 1), intimidation and retaliation against victim students (No. 2), community service (no. 4 and No. 3) 7 days (no. 4 hours of special education) under section 17(1).

On April 19, 2017, the head of Ehigh School decided to request the Plaintiff, and accordingly notified the Plaintiff of the instant measure.

On May 2, 2017, the referring of a victim student was dissatisfied with the instant measure, and filed a petition for review demanding the Defendant to take additional measures against aggressor students, and on May 30, 2017, the Defendant decided to request the Plaintiff to take additional measures to change schools under Article 17(1)8 of the School Violence Prevention Act.

hereinafter referred to as the "decision on review of this case"

E. The Plaintiff on June 2017.