logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2018.06.21 2017가단237178 (1)
채무부존재확인등
Text

1. On July 22, 2017, the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) from the G Council members of the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City F and the second floor.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is an oriental medical doctor operating the “Ghandong-gu, Incheon and the second floor” in the F and the “G Handong-gu,” and the Plaintiff is a person who prescribed the “Korea Oriental Medicine prescribed” to Defendant B, and prepared herb drugs accordingly, and Defendant B is a person who draws the above oriental medicine prepared by the Plaintiff.

B. On July 22, 2017, Defendant B visited the instant oriental medical clinic and prescribed oriental medicine prescription from the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant oriental medicine”) in accordance with the prescription of oriental medicine, and used the instant oriental medical clinic from July 26, 2017.

C. Defendant B: (a) from July 26, 2017, the instant herb drugs

7. From 27:0 to 4:00 a.m., the Plaintiff asserted that the use of the instant medicine was suspended on the ground of an influoral fluoral fluorial fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluor, etc.

Defendant B on July 30, 2017; and

7. On August 1, 2017, H hospitals began to receive treatment for the purpose of improving the symptoms, such as “abscopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopics and scopic scopic scopics” (hereinafter “instant symptoms”).

E. On August 9, 2017, Defendant B re-entered the instant oriental medicine clinic to notify the symptoms of the instant case and the contents received from the hospital, and demanded refund of medicine expenses and damages. The Plaintiff returned the medicine expenses of the instant oriental medicine to Defendant B.

F. Meanwhile, Defendant C is the father of Defendant B, and the Plaintiff’s refusal to compensate Defendant B for damages, saying, “I wish to conduct one person’s demonstration before Korea Council members, one person’s body is dead, and one’s body is considered as a funeral,” and the chair.

arrow