logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2014.06.24 2014고정404
상해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On June 25, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around 15:30 on June 25, 2013, at the “F office,” operated by the Defendant, the Victim G (57 years of age) arbitrarily moved the mechanical storage room to another place without consultation with the Defendant; (b) the Defendant argued with the victim; (c) the victim’s face was satisfying several times due to drinking; and (d) the Defendant led the victim by drinking bridges, thereby causing injury to the victim, such as fingers, satfy, satisfy, and satisfy, which require approximately two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. A witness G and H’s legal statement;

1. Legal statement of a witness I and J;

1. A medical certificate of injury to K preparation;

1. Investigation report (the relative investigation by the doctor in charge of G)

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (Investigation of persons concerned with L-Gyeong Points Points);

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of injury and the selection of fines);

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. As to the Defendant’s assertion under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the Defendant asserted that there was no assault or injury of the victim while preventing the Defendant from committing an attack by the victim at the time, but merely defending it. However, the witness of this case stated that: (a) the Defendant and the victim had a large amount of time; (b) the Defendant operated the same company; and (c) the Defendant and the victim engaged in the same type of business as the victim; and (b) H, who was in a relatively objective position with the victim, was present as a witness in this court and stated in this court that “I would like to have the Defendant live together with the victim at first time because the Defendant would have been able to sphere and sphere and sphere at the time of receiving medical treatment at the hospital after the lapse of two days from the date of the occurrence of the case; and (c) the victim’s doctor sphere sphere of the victim sphere sphere.

arrow