logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.03.30 2016나12401
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Party 1) The Plaintiff is the KSI of the religious organization B (hereinafter “instant church”).

2) The instant church is a branch church belonging to the Defendant B Religious Organization C Management Association (hereinafter referred to as the “Defendant Union”). Defendant D, E, F, G, H, I, and J (hereinafter referred to as the “Defendant full-time members”) are all the members of the Defendant Union’s exclusive jurisdiction.

B. In February 22, 2012, the Plaintiff filed a criminal complaint against the Plaintiff on the following criminal facts: “Around September 14, 2012, the Plaintiff voluntarily provided 14,000,000 won out of the reserves for the trade of the instant church to a national bank, and received personal loans; and around September 14, 2012, the Plaintiff provided 50,000,000 won of the instant church to the foreign exchange bank as security at will and embezzled them, respectively.”

C. The judgment of the defendant's association filed a complaint with the defendant's association on the purport that M pastors constitute embezzlement of the plaintiff's properties of the church of this case.

Accordingly, on April 13, 2015, the Defendant’s association investigated the Plaintiff’s embezzlement, which is the premise of the Plaintiff’s complaint case against M pastors. On the grounds that “the Plaintiff’s contribution amounting to KRW 50,000,000 and KRW 14,000,000 of the instant church are recognized, and thereby, the Plaintiff was dismissed from office as the head of the instant church (hereinafter “instant judgment”).

The main contents of the Constitution of the General Assembly of Religious Organizations (hereinafter referred to as the “instant Constitution”) to which the instant church and the Defendant’s Union belong are as shown in the attached Form.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 2 and 6 (if there are additional numbers, including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply), Eul evidence 1 and 7, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The Plaintiff’s judgment on this case’s defense was rendered.

arrow