beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[2014 Highest 122]
1. On October 1, 2014, the Defendant, who committed a crime at a private distance such as signal prior to the Seosan tunnel, was reported on October 1, 2014 to the effect that “A driver is aboard the vehicle in the atmosphere during his/her signal” from the private distance prior to the Seosan tunnel, which was located in Seosan-dong 49 (Songsan-dong), and was dispatched to the site, the Defendant refused to take a drinking test and attempted to leave the site on the ground that D, who was suspected to have driven a drinking, such as drinking alcohol, by drinking the Defendant.
Accordingly, D assaulted D's chest with the Defendant's grandchildren at once.
Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties by police officers on criminal investigation.
2. The Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender on the ground that he refused to take a alcohol level and obstructed the performance of official duties as above, and the Defendant was sent to the police box located in the north-gu E at port on the same day at around 01:29 of the same day. At this point, the F of the police box, who was assigned to the C police box, assaulted the Defendant at one time to walk the F’s left side bridge by questioning the Defendant’s personal information.
Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties by police officers on criminal investigation.
[2014 Highest 1270] On October 1, 2014, the Defendant stopped on the one-lane of the two-lane of the 49 intersection in the northwest-gu, the northwest-gu, the northwest-gu, the northwest-gu, the one-lane of the 49-lane and did not comply with the Defendant’s request without justifiable grounds, on the grounds that there are reasonable grounds to recognize that the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol, such as the Defendant’s walking on the face, while driving the G bargaining car at around 01:1, the Defendant stopped on the one-lane of the two-lane of the 49-lane, the two-lane of the two-lane of the west-gu, the one-lane of the nearby driver, who was dispatched after receiving a report from the surrounding driver.
Summary of Evidence
[2014 Highest 122]
1. The defendant;