1. The amount of real estate stated in the separate sheet shall be put to an auction and the remainder after deducting the auction cost from the price shall be attached;

1. The fact that Defendant D purchased 31/1352 shares of the real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant real estate”) from G on June 23, 201 and completed the registration of ownership transfer; Defendant E purchased 496/1352 shares of the instant real estate from G on July 4, 2012 and completed the registration of ownership transfer; Defendant B purchased 525/1352 shares of the instant real estate from G and completed the registration of ownership transfer; Defendant B purchased 525/1352 shares of the instant real estate on October 10, 2012 from G; the Plaintiff (Appointed; hereinafter “Plaintiff”); the Selection; the 11/1352 shares of the instant real estate among the Defendant D shares; and the registration of ownership transfer; the Plaintiff F; the Defendants owned 40/1352 shares of the instant real estate with co-ownership of the instant real estate and the entire maximum debt amount; and the Plaintiff’s co-ownership of the instant real estate as 250/140 shares of the instant real estate.

According to the above facts of recognition, the Plaintiff, a co-owner of the instant real estate, may file a claim against the Defendants for the division of the instant real estate.

As to this, Defendant B and E asserts that since the real estate of this case was purchased by specifying the purchase portion at the time of the purchase by the Defendants, the Plaintiff’s claim is unreasonable.

According to the evidence Nos. 3 and 5, and witness G testimony of the above Defendants, it may be recognized that the above Defendants attached a location confirmation of a specific part of the instant real estate at the time of concluding a sales contract with respect to the instant real estate. However, the above facts of recognition alone are specific parts of the instant real estate.