A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years and six months.

The evidence seized by the defendant shall be confiscated as prescribed in subparagraph 1.

Punishment of the crime

On May 14, 2010, the Defendant sentenced the Seoul Central District Court to two years of imprisonment for fraud, etc., and completed the execution of the sentence in the Ansan Prison on January 2, 2012.

1. On August 10, 2012, the Defendant forged securities: (a) on the paper of a promissory note prepared in advance at the Defendant’s office located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Public Notice Telecom 202, the Defendant stated “one million won in the column of the amount of the note in the color-sealed-type package”; (b) on the payment date column, “ August 29, 2012”; (c) “D” in the payment date column; and (d) “E” and “F” in the payment place column; and (d) stamped A’s seal kept in custody following the name.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising, the Defendant forged a promissory note in the name of F, which is a securities.

2. On August 10, 2012, the Defendant, in violation of the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. (sexual traffic) committed sexual intercourse with H one time, promising H to pay 500,000 won in return for sexual intercourse at the Young-gu, Seocheon-gu, Busan to pay for sexual intercourse at H at around 19:00.

3. The Defendant issued, at the time, and at the place specified in paragraph 2, forged promissory notes, as described in paragraph 1, to the above H, who is aware of the forgery, in return for a sex relationship, as if they were actually issued.

4. The Defendant, at the time and place stated in paragraph 2, delivered forged promissory notes to the victim H as if they were genuinely formed, saying, “this would give a bank an exchange of false promissory notes with one million won in cash, and 500,000 won, excluding consideration for sex relations.”

However, the above promissory note was forged and could not be exchanged in cash.

The defendant was given 50,000 won in cash from the victim's seat.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police of the defendant.