The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. In light of the summary of the grounds for appeal in light of all the sentencing conditions, the lower court’s imprisonment (one year and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The crime of fraud of this case, in which the defendant participated, is a so-called "scaming" crime, which is a systematic and planned crime committed against unspecified or many victims. The crime of fraud of this case is very poor because it is a so-called "cash withdrawal liability", and the defendant takes charge of the role of bringing the above money from the victims to the victims in cash by withdrawing the money transferred from the victims into his account and depositing the money into his account, thereby enabling other members to commit such systematic crimes. Through this, the defendant was paid part of the amount of the money obtained through the money, which is not much of the profits from the money received, and the defendant was not paid, and the defendant did not actually interfere with the investigation of the investigative agency by informing his accomplice of the fact that he was arrested in advance through the cell phone Kakao Stockholm, after arrest of other accomplices after the arrest of the investigation agency, and the defendant did not make efforts to recover damage until the court below held that the defendant did not have made any effort to do so, taking into account the above circumstances, the court below's sentencing of this case is too unfair.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.