The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the defendant.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Basic Facts

The Plaintiff is a person who carries out a public housing zone project (hereinafter referred to as “instant project”) for the area of the said area, including the B B large 330 square meters (hereinafter referred to as “the instant land”). On December 31, 2015, the designation and public announcement of the public housing zone for the instant project was made as D public notification of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport on December 31, 2015, and on December 28, 2016, the designation and public announcement of the designation of the public housing zone and the district plan was made as E public notification of the Ministry of Land

The Defendant owned a building listed in the attached list 1 on the ground of the instant land (hereinafter “instant building”) and a tree (specific details are as listed in the attached list 2; hereinafter “instant trees”) and possessed the instant land, the instant building and the instant trees.

On November 8, 2018, the Plaintiff filed an application for adjudication of expropriation with the Central Land Expropriation Committee (hereinafter “instant adjudication of expropriation”) to the effect that the Plaintiff would expropriate the instant land and buildings for the instant project, have the instant trees transferred, and the commencement date of expropriation would be January 2, 2019 (hereinafter “instant adjudication of expropriation”).

On December 21, 2018, the Plaintiff deposited KRW 1,216,857,140 for compensation for the instant land, buildings, and trees of this case, as determined by the instant expropriation ruling, and completed the registration of ownership transfer on February 22, 2019 for the instant land and buildings.

On February 13, 2020, the Defendant filed a lawsuit against the Plaintiff, etc. on the revocation of the adjudication of expropriation under the Suwon District Court 2019Guhap60456, and the above court rendered a judgment dismissing all of the claims seeking the revocation of the adjudication of expropriation of this case.

【Ground of recognition” has no dispute, and all entries and arguments in Gap's 1 through 6 (including virtual numbers) are made.