logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2014.02.13 2013고합200
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등상해)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for five years.

10.5cm in length, the total length of which is 20.5cm in length, which has been seized by the defendant;

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 6, 2001, the defendant married with the victim C(51) and had a legal marital relationship with the victim C, and the victim D (30 years of age) who is the father of the victim C, was in a marital relationship with the victim D (30 years of age).

1. On June 14, 2013, the Defendant suffered property damage on the ground that the “F” restaurant operated by the victim C, which is located in the Ma, Sung-nam-si, Ma-gu, Sungnam-si, Ma, was found to have concealed the Defendant’s operation of the restaurant, and that the victim was able to do so. In doing so, the Defendant damaged the property owned by the victim C by putting the gate and harmony at the gate, stating that the victim was able to “Iri, I would like to be the gate, here, to be the gate, and funeral.” The Defendant collected two tables, followed up the phone and the card terminal, thereby impairing its utility.

2. On June 24, 2013, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Violence, etc. Act against Victims D, the Punishment of Violences, etc. against Victims C (a collective injury with a deadly weapon, etc.), and the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (an injury with a deadly weapon, etc.), and the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (an injury with a deadly weapon, etc.), on the grounds of the facts constituting an offense stated in the preceding paragraph, etc., was ordered to take ad hoc measures such as prohibiting access to Victims C by the Sungwon District Court Branch branch branching Sungwon District Court (Uwon District Court 201

(Y) On August 26, 2013, the Defendant reported the victim C to himself on the day after receiving the call from the Defendant of the revised Police Station and from G in the process of having jurisdiction over the police station around 10:36 on August 26, 2013, stating that “I will leave the victim’s restaurant at the victim’s restaurant and be subject to the investigation at the time of the report.”

On August 26, 2013, at around 14:08, the Defendant sought F cafeterias listed in the preceding paragraph with a lethal weapon for the purpose of retaliationing the victim C.

Although the Defendant was boomed with the victim D before the F cafeteria, the Defendant had boomed the victim D with the victim D, “A before filing a report to the police” from the victim D, I would like to listen to the horses.

arrow