The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal by the defendant is improper because the punishment imposed by the court below (the imprisonment of four years and the fine of three hundred thousand won) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment does not seem to have favorable circumstances for the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant has both committed the crime and has divided his mistake, and some of the thiefeds were returned to the victims.

However, the crime of this case was committed by the defendant under the influence of alcohol to inflict an injury on the victim by assaulting the victim, or by destroying the victim several times, and the nature of the crime is not good. In the case of robbery, bodily injury, and special larceny, the defendant led the accomplice as an extension person, such as proposing the criminal act against the accomplice, and led the criminal act. The defendant again led to the crime of this case even though he had the record of receiving juvenile protective disposition several times due to special larceny, attack, character and behavior, intelligence and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., it is not recognized that the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable. Thus, the above assertion by the defendant is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.