The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence of the court below (three years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Even when considering the fact that the defendant was committed at the time of and against the judgment, the defendant had the history of having been punished by imprisonment with prison labor several times for the same thief crimes before the instant case, the defendant was released from the place of repeated crime even though he was committed during the period of repeated crime, and repeatedly committed the larceny crime more than three to four months, and the defendant was involved in the instant crime by first proposing to commit the crime before his accomplice, and the damage has not been recovered, and all other circumstances, such as the defendant’s age, character, character, environment, family relationship, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc., which are the conditions for sentencing, are considered as being too excessive, and thus, the defendant’s assertion is not reasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided

(However, according to Article 25 (1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure, the "Jinju District Court" in the first sentence of the facts constituting the crime of the judgment of the court below shall be changed to "Jinwon District Court", and the summary of the evidence shall be deleted from 9 and 10 "Investigation Report (Report on Results of Confirmation of Disposition and Confirmation of Date of Release)", and shall be corrected to add "the defendant's trial statement at the trial".