1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is that the last 4 pages of the judgment of the court of first instance is "Seoul Administrative Court", and that "On the other hand, the plaintiffs claim disclosure of each information listed in the separate sheet on March 4, 201, and thus the extinctive prescription has been suspended. However, since the information disclosure claim cannot be deemed as a cause for suspending extinctive prescription of the right to collect national tax related to the collection of national tax, the above argument by the plaintiffs is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for adding "the grounds for suspending extinctive prescription of the right to collect national tax related," and thus, it shall be quoted in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article

In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is justifiable, and all appeals by the plaintiffs are dismissed.