logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.01.09 2017누67157
정보공개거부처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance concerning the instant case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the addition of the following: “The first instance court’s determination that the Plaintiff constitutes “the Plaintiff’s request for information disclosure” is justifiable, where a person notified of the information disclosure decision as to March 2, 2017, as to whether the Plaintiff submitted additional evidence (Evidence A11 through 15) by this court, requests a new disclosure of the pertinent information without justifiable grounds; thus, it is cited pursuant to Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.”

(1) The plaintiff filed an application for resumption of argument with respect to the defendant's legal representative, but this is merely a suspicion without any ground. Meanwhile, the plaintiff presented all necessary arguments and presented sufficient evidence at the first date for pleading of the court of first instance, and there is no other ground to resume the pleading, and thus, the court of first instance is justified. Thus, the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow