1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Facts of recognition;

가. 피고의 망부 소외 D는 그 소유이던 화성시 C 임야 9단 1무보(이하 ‘이 사건 임야’라고 한다)와 이 사건 임야에 접한 타인 소유의 E 임야에 걸쳐있는 별지 도면 표시 3, 43, 42, 41, 40, 39, 38, 37, 36, 35, 34, 4, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 3의 각 점을 순차로 연결한 선내 ㉣, ㄴ부분 280㎡(현재 울타리가 쳐져있어 그 주위 토지와 구분되어 그 지상 주택의 대지로 사용되고 있으며, 그 중 별지 도면 표시 3, 43, 42, 41, 40, 39, 38, 37, 36, 35, 34, 4, 3의 각 점을 순차로 연결한 선내 ㉣부분 213㎡가 이 사건 임야에 속해 있으며, 이 부분을 이하 ‘이 사건 대지’라고 한다) 지상에 1955년경 주택(이하 ‘이 사건 주택’이라고 한다, 일반건축물대장에는 이 사건 주택의 지번이 화성시 F으로 기재되어 있으나 실제 위치는 이 사건 임야 지번으로 보이며, 현재 미등기 상태이다)을 건축하였다.

B. The Plaintiff’s deceased non-party G (the blood relationship with D) appears to have resided in the instant housing since around 1960 along with his wife H (the Plaintiff’s mother) and his children.

(The non-party I, who is the birth of the plaintiff, has reported the birth of the house in J.).

On August 28, 1967, the forest land of this case was registered with the defendant on August 30, 1967.

G died in the instant house on March 10, 1989, and thereafter, H died on August 29, 201 and died on August 29, 201, and the Plaintiff inherited H’s property solely through an agreement on the division of inherited property among the inheritors.

[Reasons for Recognition] A-3, 5, 6-1, and 9-12 are written and videoed, and the result of the commission of surveying and appraisal to the head of the Korea-do headquarters of the Gyeonggi-do branch office of the Korea-do branch office, and the result of the commission of surveying and appraisal, whether all pleadings are conducted.

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion is that the Plaintiff’s deceased father G from the Defendant’s deceased father D around 1960 and that of this case.