The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal began to have contact with the bicycle front wheels in the following parts of the instant accident site: (a) the Defendant: (b) led the bicycle in the vicinity of the instant accident site; and (c) transferred a few meters radius; and (d) C began to have contact with

After that, although the police investigation process discussed C's failure, the police investigators purchased C and operated the case in a direction disadvantageous to the defendant.

In other words, although the defendant did not commit a crime as stated in the facts charged, the court below erred by misapprehending the facts.

2. The judgment of the court below also asserted that the defendant did not commit the crime as stated in the facts charged of this case, and the court below rejected the defendant's assertion and convicted the defendant of the facts charged of this case.

In full view of the evidence duly admitted and examined by the court below, the following circumstances are as follows: ① the place in which this case occurred is India; ② in the court of the court of the court below, “C goes back to India intending to go back to the company after completing a meal; ② Haol sound did not seem to go back to the company, but did not go back to it; ② Ha talked that he did not go back to the court of the court below; ② Ha talked that he did not go back to the court of the court of the court below; and Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Hadd Hadd Had Hadd Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had h, Id Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had h, and Had Had Had k.