1. As to the payment order for the loan case between C and the Defendant, the Seoul Central District Court 2012 tea1323.

C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “C”) filed an application with the Seoul Central District Court for a payment order for a loan against the Defendant as Seoul Central District Court 2012 tea1323. On April 3, 2012, the payment order (hereinafter “instant payment order”) with the content that “the Defendant would pay C 243,576,220 won and delay damages and demand procedure expenses for KRW 230,000 among them,” and C transferred the claim under the instant payment order to the Plaintiff on November 2, 2018, and C delegated the Plaintiff with the authority to notify the said assignment of claim, and the fact that the notice of assignment of claim sent by the Plaintiff to the Defendant was served to the Defendant on March 21, 2019 with the duplicate of the complaint of this case, and it is clear that the purport of the entire pleadings in each of subparagraphs 1, 3, and 5, or that the record of this case was written.

According to the above facts, the plaintiff is the successor to the claim under the payment order of this case, and the junior administrative officer, etc. of the Seoul Central District Court shall grant the execution clause to the plaintiff who is the successor of C for compulsory execution against the defendant.

The plaintiff's claim of this case is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition.