E The Seoul Central District Court 2014 Gaz. 81708 decided to recommend the performance of the gold acquisition case between E and the Defendants.

Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments in the evidence Nos. 1 through 4 (including the number with several numbers), E Co., Ltd. has a claim against the Defendants based on the final decision of performance recommendation of the case for acquisition by transfer (Seoul Central District Court 2014 Ghana 817088), and (2) thereafter E Co., Ltd. has transferred a claim based on the decision of performance recommendation to F Co., Ltd. on February 17, 2015, and thereafter transferred a claim based on the above performance recommendation to the Plaintiff on February 27, 2019.

According to the above facts, the first creditor of the claim based on the decision to recommend the above performance.

The plaintiff, who is the final successor of the E-company, cannot certify the succession due to the failure of the notification of the transfer of claims to the Defendants by the debtor. Thus, the plaintiff, who is the final successor of the E-company, may file a lawsuit claiming the execution clause in this court.

Therefore, with respect to the decision of recommending the performance of the gold acquisition case No. 817088, Seoul Central District Court 2014, the Seoul Central District Court official, etc. should grant the execution clause to the Plaintiff, the final successor of the E Company, for compulsory execution against the Defendants.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is reasonable, and it is decided as per Disposition by admitting it.