logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구고등법원 2015.07.17 2014누442
교습비등조정명령취소
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part concerning Plaintiff U, AG, AH, and AV shall be modified as follows:

Defendant on July 13, 2012.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance except for dismissal or addition of some contents as follows. Thus, this case is cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The secondhh of the judgment of the first instance court is "Enforcement Decree" as "Enforcement Decree (amended by Presidential Decree No. 25375, Jun. 11, 2014; hereinafter the same shall apply)."

In the thirdhhh of the judgment of the first instance court, the Intervenor, who succeeded to the Plaintiff, acquired the CG private teaching institute operated by the Plaintiff U from the Plaintiff U, and subsequently registered the establishment and operation of the private teaching institute under his/her own name on October 17, 2014. The Intervenor’s successor to the Plaintiff, who succeeded to the registration of the change in the establishment and operation of the private teaching institute under his/her own name on January 3, 2014. The Intervenor’s successor to the Plaintiff, who acquired the BG institute operated by the Plaintiff AG from the Plaintiff, made a registration of the change in the name of the founder and operator of the private teaching institute under his/her own name on March 22, 2013. The Intervenor’s successor to the Plaintiff, who acquired the Plaintiff’s succession to the Plaintiff’s private teaching institute under his/her own name on March 22, 2013, and made an additional registration of the change in the name of the Intervenor’s successor to the Plaintiff 1, who succeeded to the Plaintiff 14G.

In the judgment of the first instance court, the "registration of change (report)" shall be considered as "registration of change (report)".

The "156 won (15.% increase)" under the fifth below the judgment of the court of first instance shall be 156 won (15.0%).

arrow