1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following cases, and thus, this case is cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The second part of the judgment of the first instance court is the "Enforcement Decree" of the second part of the judgment, which is the "Enforcement Decree (amended by Presidential Decree No. 25375, Jun. 11, 2014; hereinafter the same shall apply)".

The "registration of change (report)" in the 10th sentence of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be read as "registration of change (report)".

Under the 12th judgment of the first instance court, "156 won (15.0% increase)" shall be considered as "156 won (15.0% increase)".

Article 18 of the first instance court's decision that "I am..............." is that "It is doubtful whether the amount of a branch equivalent to 70% from the lowest tuition fees to the highest tuition fees as a result of the above standard teaching survey conducted by the defendant of the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Office of Education, which is higher than the standard set by the defendant, is reasonable in itself or not as a standard amount established in consideration of price increase rate, price increase rate, increase rate of tuition fees compared to the previous year, hours of lessons, region characteristics, type, size, facilities level, etc. of private teaching institutes."

From the 30th session of the judgment of the first instance court to the sbbebbebes, the following is raised.

(1) Pursuant to Articles 14-2 (6) and 15 (6) of the Act, the Superintendent of an Office of Education shall deliberate on matters concerning the adjustment of tuition fees, etc. by regional offices of education under Article 34 (1) of the Local Education Autonomy Act (hereinafter referred to as "Coordination Committee") in order to deliberate on matters concerning the adjustment of tuition fees, etc. by regional offices of education under Article 34 (1) of the Local Education Autonomy Act.

....