logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2013.07.05 2013고단1793
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a wing and cargo vehicle B.

On April 8, 2013, the Defendant driven the above cargo vehicle at around 06:45, and proceeded to the intersection of the entrance of food felbs in the Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju at approximately 60 km from the surface of the Seo-gu Hospital to the high-speed flebri distance.

The location had a duty of care to prevent accidents by normally proceeding according to the traffic signal to a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle on the intersection with a signal, etc.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and went through the intersection due to the negligence of entering the intersection even though it was a stop signal, and the Defendant got off the right side of the DNA observer car driven by the victim C (A, 56 years old) who passed the intersection from the math area of Gwangju Bank to the math area of the math area of Gwangju Bank.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury, such as duplicating cages that require approximately six weeks of medical treatment due to the above occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement of the occurrence of a traffic accident C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 3 (1), the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The grounds for sentencing are as follows: (a) the Defendant recognized the instant crime; (b) the Defendant agreed with the victim after the instant indictment; (c) the Defendant’s vehicle is subscribed to a comprehensive motor vehicle insurance policy and appears to assist the victim in recovering damage; and (d) the Defendant has no criminal history at all.

arrow