The part of the judgment of the first instance, including the Plaintiff-Counterclaim Defendant’s claim on the principal lawsuit expanded in the first instance trial, is as follows.

1. The judgment of the court of first instance partially accepted the Plaintiff’s claim on the principal lawsuit, and the remainder was dismissed, and all of the Defendant’s claim on the counterclaim was dismissed.

Since only the plaintiff appealed against the plaintiff among the main part of the judgment of the court of first instance as to the part of the judgment against the plaintiff, the claim of the main part as above is expanded in the court of first instance, and the purport of appeal is modified, the scope of the judgment of the court of first instance is limited to the main part of the judgment of the court of first instance,

2. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff and the Defendant’s related Plaintiff were hospitalized in the Gagwon Hospital operated by the Defendant (Seoul Western-gu 83-ro 14, hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”), and received an operation from K of the physician of the Defendant Hospital.

The defendant is the user of the defendant hospital doctor K in charge of the operation of the plaintiff.

B. On March 24, 2009, the Plaintiff was diagnosed of integrigere expenses and conical signboards escape from the toilet on March 24, 2009. On March 26, 2009, the Plaintiff complained of the climatics, pains, pains, etc. on both sides, and applied to the Defendant Hospital. On March 27, 2009, the Plaintiff was diagnosed of integroide expenses and conical signboards escapes.

On March 31, 2009, the Plaintiff received from K of the Defendant Hospital’s medical doctor 2-3 postmathical and 4th century, and received from K of the instant surgery (hereinafter “instant surgery”).

C. The Plaintiff’s disability occurred immediately after the instant surgery, and the Plaintiff continued to receive preservation treatment (water treatment and pain treatment), but there was constant symptoms of paralysis.

On February 10, 2011, the Plaintiff was diagnosed by the doctor of B University Hospital (KD) with hyetrophical dyetrophal dye, accompanied by dyetrophal dyetrophal dyetrophal dyetrophal dyetrophye, and other

The plaintiff shows symptoms such as physical disability, pain, urology disorder, etc. (hereinafter referred to as the "instant disability") due to the state of bad paralysis.