logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.04.30 2014나45920
손해배상(의)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The plaintiff's total costs of the lawsuit after the appeal are filed.

Reasons

Facts of recognition

Around November 29, 2002, the Plaintiff complained of the Maguri Certificate and received treatment at the D Hospital operated by the Defendant Social Welfare Foundation B (hereinafter “Defendant Corporation”) (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”). The Defendant Hospital was given medical treatment at the Defendant Hospital on October 29, 2003, and on November 4, 2003, at the Defendant Hospital, at the Overseas Medical Foundation of the Medical Corporation, at the Overseas Medical Foundation of the Medical Corporation, on November 4, 2003.

On October 16, 2006, the Plaintiff received medical treatment under the diagnosis of “hiveebrate, bones, and any other side signboard disability accompanied by the nephal ppuri disease certificate” from a member of the Emical department. On October 18, 2006, the Plaintiff received medical treatment under the same disease name as the J Hospital’s name.

On October 30, 2006, the Plaintiff returned to the Defendant Hospital. At the time, at the time, the Plaintiff complained of a eyerling Grade’s degree 500 meters her right-hand, and the Plaintiff complained of a intermittent strike at the time of walking. As a result of the X-ray shooting test, the 5th degree of the eyerling Grade’s degree 4 minutes, which corresponds to the degree of the method indicated in classes 1 through 4, was observed by the eyerling Gra’s level her degree her class 1 to the 5th class 4 level, but the part

On January 4, 2007, the Plaintiff complained of the Mari No. Mari No. 4, and moved back to the Defendant hospital again, and as a result of the photographic test of self-known video (MRI), the Plaintiff was hospitalized in the Defendant hospital on the same day in order to undergo surgery under the diagnosis of the Mari No. 1,000 Mari No. 5, 1,000 Mari No. 5, Mari No. 1,000, considering both Mari No. 1,000, and

On January 5, 2007, the Plaintiff, the president of the Defendant Hospital, was discharged from the Defendant Hospital on January 11, 2007, after the implementation of the instant surgery, on the following day: (a) the Plaintiff was discharged from the Defendant Hospital on January 5, 2007, on the following day: (b) the instant surgery was conducted on the 5th century, and the 5th century, and on the 1,000 vertebrate brate.

On January 16, 2007, the Plaintiff complained of the E-type Foreign Affairs Council members of the E-type, who did not keep to the right at the time, and there was a pain to the extent that he did not sleep properly. On January 17, 2007, the Plaintiff claimed that there was a pain to the right.

arrow