beta
Text
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
Reasons
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal did not appear to have taken place when the victims were involved.
2. The following circumstances revealed by the evidence duly adopted and examined in the judgment of the court below and the trial court, namely, the victim F, the police officer: “The victim C, the chief of which is the victim and the defendant, who is the head of the Gu in the stairs of the Naart-gu, make a breath in the middle because he was flabing, the inside of the Defendant was teared, drinking, and drinking,” and the defendant was found to have entered the age accounting room.
“Defendant” is not intended to see when the victim C, but to drink to see the victim C. It is appropriate for the victim’s face.
In the telephone conversation with the police, I assaulted the victim C first in the form of drinking, and it was difficult for the victim C to use the victim’s drinking and head after he assaulted the victim C with drinking.
The fact that the statement was made by the lower court, and the witness G did not dispute the Defendant and the victim C at the lower court court’s court court’s trial, and it was difficult for them to have been sealed more than 10 minutes, and the victim F&C also told the victim F&C.
At the court of the court below, the witness F, the defendant and the victim C appeared to live in dubials, and the defendant did not c at the time, and the defendant was bleeped. The defendant was able to bleep himself.
In full view of the fact that the situation at the time of the instant fighting is relatively and concretely stated, while the witness F stated that the situation at the time of the instant fighting is not accurate memory in the trial court, it appears that this is due to the fact that the memory was unexpected depending on the flow of time, etc., it can be sufficiently recognized that the Defendant suffered injury to the victims during the time of the instant fighting with the victim C as stated in the facts charged in the instant case.
Therefore, the defendant's argument cannot be accepted.
3.