logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2014.10.02 2014노1169
상해
Text

The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. According to the summary of the grounds for appeal - the statements of the victim C, G, and F and the written diagnosis of injury, the defendant may be recognized as having inflicted an injury by assaulting the victim as shown in the facts charged.

2. In light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the market records, namely, C and F: (a) at the time discovered that G was out of the back to the back, and stated that C and F were to go to the hospital; (b) consistent with C and F’s above statement on the process of finding the injury of C and F; (c) on the day of the instant case, C were to receive medical treatment at the hospital; (d) there is a difference between C, F, and G, but in the end, C, F, and G stated that the instant assault was committed in the vicinity of the stairs down of the registry office; and (c) according to the report report records at the time, it is doubtful that the Defendant did not inflict a bodily injury by assaulting C.

However, according to the records, ① the police at the time when 112 was reported to the site and asked whether the Defendant and C were assaulted by the Defendant and C, but all the Defendant and C were asked to the effect that they did not have been assaulted by the police (such request was made by the police, and as seen earlier, C made a statement to the effect that the police did not speak of the facts of assault because of the lack of the fact. However, as seen earlier, the police at the time asked C and the Defendant of the assault during the 112 Report, and thus, C made a statement to the effect that he was assaulted by C and the Defendant at the time. ② The police at the time asked F at the site of this case. ② The F made a statement to the effect that the Defendant was not aware of the credibility of C’s statement by making the statement to the effect that the Defendant was drinking by C at the court of original instance, ③ the F made the head of the registry at the time when the Defendant was sealed by C at the investigation stage, and the head of the Defendant was found to be spabroknn and the Defendant was stroking.

arrow