1. On March 28, 2014, the Defendant rendered a decision on the payment of bereaved family's compensation to the Plaintiffs, and on the non-approval of medical care for official duties.

Details of the disposition

Plaintiff

On October 23, 191, Plaintiff B and C’s denial network D (EE; hereinafter “the deceased”) were appointed as the public official of Incheon Metropolitan City on February 29, 2012, and were dispatched to the “Organizing Asian Games Organizing Committee of 2014 Incheon Asian Games” (hereinafter “2014 Incheon Asian Games”; and the Organizing Committee from February 29, 2012 to August 27, 2013, the Organizing Committee was dispatched to G, respectively.

On January 8, 2014, the deceased lost consciousness after old soil around 12:45, among withdrawal of rest in the vicinity of the first floor of the committee of this case, after completing a meeting of work with respect to the provision of meals to the Incheon Atotory Game as a result of providing meals to the Incheon Atory Game.

As a result of the CT shooting conducted by the deceased, he/she was sent to a H hospital, and the deceased was diagnosed with cerebral cerebral typhism, he/she continued to undergo cerebral surgery after being transferred to the Acheon University University Street Hospital capable of surgery on the same day, but died on January 20, 2014.

A private person of the deceased is a direct death, a high level of brain side, a middle-line event, and a brain dysia, a senior death.

The Plaintiffs asserted that the deceased died while on duty due to a disease caused by official duties, and applied for the approval of compensation for bereaved families and the medical treatment for official duties. However, the Defendant rejected all of the Plaintiffs’ applications for approval of medical treatment for official duties and the claim for compensation for bereaved families on March 28, 2014 on the ground that “it is difficult to deem that there exists a proximate causal relation with the deceased’

hereinafter referred to as the "disposition of this case"

(ii) [Ground of recognition] unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1, 2, Eul evidence 1 to 4 (if any, including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply);

The deceased’s assertion of legitimacy of the instant disposition and the purport of the entire pleadings has died due to considerable occupational and stress. As such, the deceased’s death is on duty.