The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. Around September 2013, the summary of the facts charged: (a) the Defendant, along with the Defendant’s wife E at the office of the Victim C victim D, the Gyeongcheon-gun, Gyeongcheon-gun, Gyeongcheon-gun, requested the victim to lend the victim’s name to the effect that “The Defendant was employed by Youngcheon-gun, the husband and wife left employment; (b) the Defendant deducted the Plaintiff from his name due to traffic inconvenience; and (c) the Defendant would later pay the money later; but (d) the victim refused this request, and (e) the Defendant threatened the victim by saying, “I would bring an accusation as to whether I would not be able to obtain any permit from his house.”

2. The charge of this case is a crime falling under Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express will under Article 283(3) of the Criminal Act.

However, on May 14, 2015, after the prosecution of this case was instituted, the victim expressed his intention not to have the defendant tried to be punished by attending the court as a witness. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.