The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is the person who runs a repair center.

At around 19:00 on November 12, 2012, the Defendant damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts, while the husband and wife of the victim G (which is 66 years of age) is not in a resistant relationship. However, the Defendant’s name, in spite of the fact that the husband and wife of the victim G (which is 66 years of age) is not in a resistant relationship. However, the Defendant’s name, i.e., “S. witness, bookbook, Manung, his husband and wife are not in a dynamic relationship.”

2. Determination

(a) Crimes of non-compliance with an intention (Article 312 (2) of the Criminal Act);

(b) The victim is not subject to punishment after the indictment of this case.

(c) Judgment dismissing public prosecution (Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act);