logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2015.11.13 2015고단886
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On March 2011, the Defendant worked in the Rabb Blof, “E,” which is operated by pro-friendly D in Ansan-si, and had been operated from August 201, 201, and the victim F frequentlyd as a customer of the above Kaf, and sent the victim F to the close relation with the Defendant.

The Defendant, around August 201, at the above LBC, told D to take over the above car page, and told D that “A car page is well operated and it is demanded that the Defendant would be paid KRW 1,40,000 as the acquisition price, including the amount of KRW 1,20,000 investment and the amount of KRW 20,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won.”

However, the defendant did not intend to repay the above borrowed money by abusing the close relationship with the victim even if he did not pay profits in the course of operating the said LbC by borrowing money from the victim.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as such and is subject to the same year as the price for taking over carpets from the victim.

9. Around January 1, 200 won was transferred to a national bank account in the name of D; KRW 15 million was transferred to a new bank account in the name of G on or around the 16th day of the same month; KRW 50 million was transferred to the said new bank account on or around the 21st day of the same month; and KRW 140 million was transferred to the said new bank account on or around the 29th day of the same month, respectively.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness F, H and G;

1. The defendant asserts that the complaint (including the attached account details, etc.) was a donation of KRW 140,000,000,000, not borrowed.

However, the following circumstances revealed by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, that is, the victim, who is consistently and consistently loaned money to the defendant from the investigative agency, and that the defendant was willing to repay the money, and the witness H also asserts.

arrow