1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 107,950,000 for the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from August 1, 2010 to December 24, 2014; and (b) December 25, 2014.

1. In full view of the purport of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 10 and the entire arguments, the plaintiff and the defendant maintained close relations with each other from high school graduation from around 2007. However, on November 14, 2008, the defendant in collusion with Eul to the plaintiff on November 14, 2008 with the lack of deposit money to use the "E" at the D coffee specialty store, and then transferred 30 million won to one bank under the defendant's name to the defendant bank around November 14, 2008. On January 12, 2009, the plaintiff and the defendant knew that "2 million won was transferred to the defendant's agricultural bank account under the defendant's name to the defendant's agricultural bank account as of January 16, 2009, and that the plaintiff did not receive 90 million won from the above No. 3300,000 won to the above agricultural bank account as of January 16, 2009.

It is impossible to repay the borrowed money if the car business is wrong.

Security loans can be granted under very good condition to those who are well aware of the USFFFF, and interest on loans shall be repaid by us, and if the problem arises, Kafffffff will be repaid first of all.

The nominal owner of a loan is the name of the defendant, and there is no later error.

On January 19, 2009, the Plaintiff provided an apartment 106 dong 1306,000 and borrowed a total of KRW 80,000 from the said chemical credit cooperative and acquired KRW 40,000 from the said chemical credit cooperative account in the name of the Defendant, and acquired it by fraud on June 15, 200, and ③ from the E car page on June 15, 2009, the Plaintiff paid a loan of KRW 10,000,000 from the Plaintiff.

“The loan owner is the Defendant and the Defendant has to pay the full amount.”