beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On August 19, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for habitual fraud at the Seoul East District Court (Seoul East District Court) and completed the execution of the sentence at the Sungdong detention center on July 4, 2012.
1. Although Defendant 131 of the 2016 senior group ordered food to the delivery restaurant, the victims did not have the intent or ability to pay the price, the Defendant attempted to receive money from the victims by means of public telephone in order to prevent the victims from tracking the Defendant, making a false call to the delivery restaurant using a public telephone, ordering food to prepare the price in advance at 10,000 won check, and waiting at the entrance of the apartment address where the food is to be delivered, and bringing the food to the ordered apartment that the victims waiting for the food to be delivered. If they bring the food to the ordered apartment, it would be necessary for them to reduce the 100,000 won check in advance, making a false statement to the victims to receive money.
A. On September 7, 2015, at around 21:35, 2015, the Defendant called the victim D’s public telephone at the elevator 13-dong apartment 13-dong, Seoul Jung-gu, Seoul, to E, and falsely speaks that “I would prepare to pay KRW 100,000 in the face of the delivery of the skin”, and the Defendant is waiting on the first floor of the above C apartment that is to be delivered with food, and the victim who has delivered the food was placed at the charge of KRW 105,00,000, after deducting KRW 15,000,000 in the house and deducting KRW 15,00,000 in the face value, the Defendant received KRW 90,00 in cash from the damaged child.” The Defendant received KRW 90,000 in cash from the damaged child.
In addition, the Defendant, from August 28, 2015 to December 26, 2015, “I” in the name of the victim No. 7 of [Attachment 1] No. 7 of the List of Offenses 1 to the List of Crimes 2015, is an obvious clerical error in “J”, and thus, is corrected ex officio.
As described above, the victims received total of KRW 810,000 in total nine times.
In this respect.