logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.11.14 2017고단748
도로교통법위반(무면허운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

The prosecution against the violation of the Road Traffic Act among the charges of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 23, 2007, the Defendant was sentenced to a summary order of KRW 4 million due to a violation of Road Traffic Act (drinking), etc. at the Busan District Court's branch branch branch on November 23, 2007. On December 29, 2008, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment of ten months with prison labor for the same crime, etc. at the Incheon District Court's District Court on December 29, 2008. On January 7, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for the violation of official duties, and five months for fraud at the Gwangju District Court on January 7, 2016. On March 31, 2016.

1. On December 10, 2016, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed driving) and the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving), without obtaining a driver’s license for a motor vehicle on or around 03:30 on December 10, 2016, the Defendant driven Cysta motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol level of 0.114% during blood, and driven the road front of the traffic high-priced vehicular road along the direction of Gwangju Airport along the five-lane distance along the direction of the transmission region of Gwangju Mine-gu.

"2017 Highest 2043"

2. Around 15:00 on April 20, 2017, the Defendant driven a Dunstun car without a driver’s license from the front of the children’s traffic park located in the area of the Yong-gu, Gwangju, Gwangju, to the front of the 98-ro of the head of the Gwangju Mine-gu.

"2017 Highest 4,303"

3. On August 18, 2017, the Defendant ordered the victim E to provide alcohol, alcohol, etc. from “G main points” operated by the victim E in Gwangju Mine-gu, Gwangju.

However, the defendant had only one physical card that exceeded the limit of use in the absence of special cash at the time, and there was no intention or ability to pay the price even if he was provided with alcoholic beverages from the injured party.

Nevertheless, the Defendant received from the injured party the total amount of 82,00 won, including 7 Cerriju, 7 Crriju, 1 Oral, and 82,00 won, and acquired it.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving others.

4. Fraud against the victim H.

arrow