A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Punishment of the crime

On November 23, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to a summary order of a fine of five million won due to a violation of road traffic law (drinking driving) in the Daegu District Court Kimcheon-gu branch of the Daegu District Court on November 23, 2011, and on September 6, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year and six months for a violation of road traffic law (drinking driving) at the Daegu District Court on September 6, 2013.

Criminal facts

On May 2, 2017, at around 16:50, the Defendant driven a C-Woo-Woo-Wood vehicle with approximately 3km alcohol content 0.137% under the influence of alcohol at a section of approximately 3km before the welfare center for the elderly, in the original common parking lot located in the Nowon-si, Nowon-gu, Seoul.

As a result, the Defendant had been punished more than twice as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act, but once again driven a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol.

"2017 Highest 1266"

1. On June 22, 2017, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (Non-licenseless Driving) driving a motor vehicle in the section of approximately 100 meters away from the section of the road located in the same Ri on the roads front of the Han-dong apartment located in the Han-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Daegu Special Metropolitan City, Taegu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City (Seoul Special Metropolitan City), without obtaining a driver’s license for the motor vehicle in the section of approximately 100 meters front of the exit.

2. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a passenger car as provided in paragraph 1 of this Act.

On June 22, 2017, the Defendant driven the above car at around 12:30 on June 22, 2017, and led to the right bypassing the road in front of the exit of 4 times in the luxal basin in the luxle of the Dogri-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, Daegu Metropolitan City.

At the time of the road crossing where the crosswalk is installed, the above crosswalk had a duty of care to prevent the shock with pedestrians by looking at the front side of the crosswalk and by properly examining whether there is no pedestrian on the crosswalk.

Nevertheless, it is not appropriate.