1. The claims against the Defendants are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The plaintiff's assertion that the plaintiff supplied all-way pathology to the defendant A, and the defendant A supplied the paper eggs produced by raising all-way pathology to the plaintiff, the plaintiff entered into a contract for breeding of all-way pathology and supply of the papers to the defendant A with the content that the remaining amount after deducting the supply price of the paper eggs from the supply price of all-way pathology. The defendant B guaranteed the defendant A's obligation.

Accordingly, from September 25, 2003 to September 23, 2011, the Plaintiff supplied the final pathology to Defendant A. As a result of the settlement on November 1, 2012, the Plaintiff’s final pathology supply amounting to KRW 277,365,350, and delay damages therefrom, the Defendants are jointly and severally liable to pay the Plaintiff the final pathology supply amounting to KRW 277,365,350, and delay damages.

2. In full view of the purport of the entire pleadings in the statement Nos. 1 and 2 of the judgment, the Plaintiff entered into a supply contract with Defendant A on September 27, 201, for the breeding and breeding of sacrhos as claimed by the Plaintiff, and Defendant B entered into a supply contract with Defendant A on September 27, 201, and Defendant B entered into a joint and several guarantee contract with Defendant A. However, considering each of the above evidence’s descriptions Nos. 4 and 5 (which is a document unilaterally prepared by the Plaintiff, and thus cannot be recognized as evidence) as evidence, the Plaintiff supplied Defendant A with sacrhosia from September 25, 2003 to September 23, 2011.

It is not enough to recognize the fact that the supply price of goods by bottled pathia, which was not paid by the defendant A, is 277,365,350 won, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

3. The plaintiff's claim for conclusion is without merit.