The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. On April 30, 201, the Defendant reported, but did not report false facts, the lower court found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged in the instant case, thereby adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment. In so doing, it did not err by misapprehending the facts, which affected the conclusion of the judgment.

B. The lower court’s sentencing (fines 7,000,000) by the Prosecutor is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. Determination:

A. The following circumstances acknowledged by the court below based on the evidence duly examined and adopted by the defendant as to the grounds for appeal by the defendant, i.e., the defendant argued that the defendant was involved in an accident as alleged by him by viewing one lane from two lanes in the direction of the taxi driving, but according to the image at the time of filming cambling installed in F-si, F was driving at the center by avoiding the defendant who was driving at the right side from the front left side of the taxi, while the defendant was driving at the center, and the defendant was driving at the speed of two lanes in the front side of the taxi, and therefore, considering the progress direction of the taxi driving and the direction of the defendant's proceeding, it is difficult to understand that the accident that the defendant's left side side of the taxi driving at the front wheels of the taxi driving station after receiving the defendant's order to stop the immediately preceding taxi driving from the front side of the taxi driving station and following the defendant's order to stop the taxi driving.