The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

The above fine shall not be paid by the defendant.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In fact, the grandchildren of the victim misunderstanding the fact were driving about about 2-3 meters of the taxi in contact with the chief glass of the taxi, but the balked from the balk was slowly driven at a speed that is high to the extent that the balked from the balke, so the victim was not in a situation where the balk was likely to sustain the balk.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which found the defendant guilty of the injury of this case is erroneous by misunderstanding the facts and affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

B. The sentence of the lower court (an amount of KRW 1,00,000) that is unfair in sentencing is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The summary of the facts charged is Csib Articles.

On October 3, 2014, at around 05:58, the Defendant: (a) talked and talked with the head view of Defendant taxi in order to return home to the E Building located in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and (b) the victim F (son, 28 years old), and (c) started from the Defendant’s own place of view while refusing boarding, and (d) led the victim’s arms carrying the cab, and (e) led the victim’s arms carrying the cab, and (e) led the victim to approximately three weeks of treatment.

B. The lower court found the Defendant guilty of the instant facts charged by comprehensively taking account of each of the evidence in its judgment.

(c)

1) The judgment of the political party 1) " "The defendant moved a taxi while making a chief hand on the taxi and led the plaintiff to the future" means the statements made by the investigative agency of the victim and the court of the court below, and the statements made by the victim at the court of the court below to the extent that the victim continued to put the vehicle, and attached the vehicle to the future at the level of 1m because the victim continued to put the vehicle, and the victim expressed his hand that he is able to get the window by his hand (37,38 pages of the investigation record), and "the victim's hand is proceeding with the chief door glass," and the defendant's investigative agency and the court of this case. In full view of the statements consistent with some of the facts charged in this case, the defendant started that the injured person, as stated in the facts charged, was a taxi under the status of having the chief door door of the defendant's taxi.