beta
Text
Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
C and Defendant B are persons jointly operating (State) E, and Defendant A is employees of (State) E.
The Defendants purchased the vehicle at the dynasium on the dynasular border in which the deficit of the EE accumulated, as well as the warehouse rent, and offered to acquire a substantial pecuniary profit in the installment by means of not paying the installment after borrowing the vehicle as security.
Defendant
C and Defendant B provided Defendant A with “The credit standing of our country is not good.” Defendant A and Defendant B, who agreed to the purchase a vehicle from the four names.” Defendant A and Defendant B, who agreed to the foregoing, made an employee under the name of Korea (State) for the social service provider (State) of the victim Alphalian at the (State) G agency on September 15, 2014, paid the loan interest in installments for 55,679 won from October 21, 2014 to September 21, 2019.
“A false statement” was made.
However, in fact, Defendant C and Defendant B were unable to pay employees' wages more than 30 million won as accumulated by the enemy, and credit card payments created and used in Defendant A’s name were in arrears more than 11.5 million won. The credit card payments that were made and used under Defendant A’s name were in excess of 36 million won, and the amount of loans that were not made by Defendant A with loans from the two capitals and the dominion capital was in excess of 10 million won, and there was no intention or ability to pay the said installments even if they were to purchase the rent in installments.
As above, the Defendants deceptioned the victim company, and had the victim company’s name influencies pay 28.4 million won to G as the price for the above vehicle.
As a result, the Defendants conspired to induce the victim to obtain property benefits.
Summary of Evidence
1. The Defendants’ respective legal statements
1. Each of the defendants;