logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2016.11.29 2016고단1020
사기
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year, and for six months, for each of the defendants B.

However, for two years from the date this judgment has become final.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On June 2, 201, Defendant A was sentenced to two years of imprisonment for fraud in the Jeonju District Court’s Gunsan Branch, and completed the execution of the sentence on September 23, 2013, and Defendant B was sentenced to two years of suspension of execution and five million won of fine on November 16, 2015 in the Jeonju District Court’s Gunsan Branch, and the judgment became final and conclusive on February 27, 2016.

【Criminal Facts】

1. The Defendants were unable to purchase a cargo vehicle in their name, which is a bad credit holder, due to the fact that they were co-offenders of the Defendants, and were willing to borrow a cargo vehicle under the name of another person, which is irrelevant to the cargo vehicle transaction.

On March 2015, the Defendants made a false statement to the effect that, from the coffee shop in front of the E in order to introduce F to the victim G, the Defendants met with the victim G, but Defendant A purchased the trucks from the Gunsan Viewing Province and then enter the business cargo lane, the Defendants cannot purchase the trucks because they did not have good credit standing. Accordingly, the Defendants cannot purchase the trucks under the victim’s name because they purchased the 25 tons of a kn truck with the 4-month truck with the 4-month truck with the 25-month truck with the 4-month unit.”

However, in fact, even if the Defendants received a loan from the victim to purchase the cargo vehicle, they thought that they will enter the name of Defendant B following the death of the victim, and Defendant B did not work as livestock excreta in the Gunsan Viewers, and was left to the Dong-si Agricultural Cooperative, which was under business suspension at the time, and was planned to use the cargo vehicle due to illegal disposal of livestock excreta in the Saemangeum reclaimed Land located in Gunsan, so it could not be expected that normal profits could not be expected, and there was no intention or ability to pay the installment properly to the victim

The Defendants are the defendants.

arrow