logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2016.04.28 2015나13264
임금
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

purport:

Reasons

1. Determination as to the cause of claim

A. The Defendant, around July 2013, is the Plaintiff’s construction of the Daegu-gu Ltel (EMM (EM) construction (EM) from the future soil-sponsing industry Co., Ltd., Ltd. (hereinafter “instant construction”).

(2) The Defendant was awarded a subcontract. 2) The Defendant had MM use a daily wooden hole to use it, and the Plaintiffs were working as a wooden hole at the construction site of this case upon the introduction of M.

3) M directly performed the instant construction project with the Defendant’s representative director, N and O’s father, as the head of the Working Group, and 2.3 billion won. If M sent to the Defendant a daily work log, including the Plaintiffs, the Defendant paid the pertinent wage of KRW 170,00 per day from the Defendant, and paid the Defendant’s corporate card for incidental expenses for the instant construction project, including meal expenses. 4) The Plaintiffs were working at the instant construction site, and the Plaintiff A was paid KRW 17.1 million on January 17, 2014; KRW 2.3 million on December 17, 2013; KRW 2.3 million on December 31, 2013; KRW 17.1 million on December 31, 2013; KRW 100,000 on January 17, 2014; KRW 201.3 million on January 14, 2014, respectively.

5. On the other hand, the Goyang District Labor Office of the Defendant’s representative director investigation into the facts of the violation of the Labor Standards Act against N, and then sent 12 persons who engaged in the instant construction site to the effect that “including not paying wages to the Plaintiff, and not paying the Plaintiff a total of KRW 15,865,00 for the wages of December 2013,” and N to the High Government District Court of the Republic of Korea on August 7, 2015.

arrow