1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendants of the crime history room (Defendant A and B) decided to operate the sexual traffic establishment along with the sexual traffic establishment in the middle of October 2016.

Accordingly, Defendant B leased Sung-gu E and 201 above (hereinafter “instant shopping mall”) under his own name. Defendant A collected a female member who engages in sexual traffic and was in charge of fund management, and conspired to divide the profits accrued therefrom into the Defendants.

According to the above public offering, from November 2, 2016 to February 21:45, 2017, the Defendants arranged sexual traffic by having two female employees of F, etc. of F, who are female nationals of F, with the nationality of F, and receiving 90,000 won from many and unspecified males for each course and having them sexual intercourse with female employees in return.

As a result, Defendants conspired to arrange sexual traffic for business purposes.

Summary of Evidence

Defendant

The application of Acts and subordinate statutes on the scene of crime to the defendant A and B's statutory statement of each prosecutor's office F in each interrogation protocol of the defendant A and B, and the seizure protocol of each police's statement of G

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, Including Mediation of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc.; Article 30 of the Criminal Act; Selection of imprisonment;

2. Defendant A and B: Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act.

3. Defendant A who observe the protection: Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act.

4. Defendant A: Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Act, Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, Including Mediation of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc.

5. Defendant B: The reasons for sentencing under Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, the size of business place, the importance of the role of the Defendants, the criminal records of the Defendants, the scope of the recommended sentence according to the sentencing guidelines of the Supreme Court sentencing committee, etc. In particular, the sentence of suspended sentence shall be imposed in consideration of the fact that the Defendants did not have the same criminal records, confession and reflect.