logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2019.09.26 2017가합102253
부당이득금
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 3,619,669,357 for the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from June 27, 2016 to September 26, 2019 for the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Special Act on the Construction of Multifunctional Administrative City in Yeongi-Gongju Area for Follow-up Measures for the former New Administrative Capital (amended by Act No. 7604, Jul. 21, 2005; hereinafter “former Special Act on New Administrative Capital”) promulgated on March 18, 2005, and was designated as the development project district for the Multifunctional Administrative City on May 24, 2005 (hereinafter “instant project district”), and on December 20, 2005, the Defendant commenced compensation for the administrative city project within the instant project district (hereinafter “instant project”).

B. As to the instant project, the development planning was formulated on November 29, 2006, the amendment of the development plan on June 28, 2007, and the approval of the execution plan on July 4, 2007, respectively.

C. The Korea Land Corporation (Korea National Housing Corporation and the Korea Land Corporation were merged with the defendant on October 1, 2009; hereinafter "the defendant"), as the project implementer of the instant project, decided to specially sell the migrants of the housing site to be developed in the instant project zone as relocation measures to those who would lose their base of livelihood due to the expropriation of the housing site, etc. as the housing site was incorporated into the instant project zone, and accordingly, concluded a sales contract on the housing site with those subject to relocation measures.

Due to the project of this case, the migrants were selected as persons eligible for supply of migrants' housing sites, or those who wish to build multi-family housing among those who have acquired rights from the suppliers, and form the plaintiff by gathering them.

E. On June 27, 2016, the Plaintiff concluded a sales contract with the Defendant for a resettled housing site as listed below, and paid the land price in full to the Defendant.

B

F. The Defendant is based on the development cost calculated in accordance with the guidelines for the supply of land for the multifunctional administrative city, which is the direction of the Multifunctional Administrative City Construction Agency.

arrow