(영문) 대구지방법원 경주지원 2020.05.27 2020고단48

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대구지방법원 경주지원 2020.05.27 2020고단48

도로교통법위반(음주운전)등

Text

1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year;

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the defendant;

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On March 19, 2007, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 3 million for the crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act in the Daegu District Court and the summary order of KRW 7 million for the same crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act from the same support on April 27, 2018.

【Criminal Facts】

1. On November 17, 2019, the Defendant, who violated the Road Traffic Act, the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license), and the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, was under the influence of alcohol by 0.171% of alcohol at around 21:40 on November 17, 2019, while driving a vehicle with approximately 25 km distance from the front of the lodging at the construction site located in Young-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, without a driver’s license to the front of the lodging at the construction site located in the Gyeongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol by 0.171% on November 17, 201.

As a result, the defendant is driving a motor vehicle, which is not a driver's license, at the same time, not a driver's license, and operated a motor vehicle which is not covered by the mandatory insurance of motor vehicles.

2. The Defendant, at the time, and at the place specified in the above Paragraph 1., presented the F driver’s license that was requested by the Jeju Provincial Police Agency D District D District guard E, and the Defendant was in possession of the F driver’s license as if he were F, and then submitted the said report to E, after entering the “F” in the driver’s statement column of the driver’s statement report on the state of the driver’s oral statement.

Accordingly, the Defendant denied the official document, and forged the report on the circumstantial statement of the driver under F, a private document related to a certificate of fact, for the purpose of uttering, and used the forged report on the circumstantial statement of the driver under the above.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement 1.

참조조문

-도로교통법

-자동차손해배상 보장법

유사 판례

-춘천지방법원 영월지원 2014.04.04 2013고단577

-창원지방법원 2015.05.13 2014고단3251

-광주지방법원 순천지원 2014.06.11 2014고단279

-수원지방법원 평택지원 2016.10.27 2016고단1417

-대전지방법원 2015.09.18 2015고단2095