The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is unreasonable because the sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (one year and six months of imprisonment, three years of suspended execution, and 80 hours of social service) is too uneasible.

2. The crime of this case is an unfavorable circumstance to the defendant, where the defendant, without wearing a safety belt, was driven by a police officer who was under traffic control while driving a motor vehicle, and found the police officer who was under traffic control, thereby breaking the center line to avoid control, and the police officer who was driving away from the defendant requires the driver's license to produce a driver's license, and caused the police officer to inflict an injury by getting out of the road. The nature of the crime and the method of the crime are very poor, and the defendant has been punished once by a fine due to a crime of the Traffic Act.

However, the fact that the defendant was committed in the course of committing the crime of this case, the degree of injury suffered by the victim is relatively not more severe, the defendant agreed with the victim in a voluntary agreement with the victim to punish the defendant significantly, and the defendant has no record of criminal punishment other than once the above fine, etc., are favorable to the defendant.

위와 같은 사정들과 그 밖에 피고인의 나이, 성 행, 환경, 범행의 동기, 수단과 결과, 범행 후의 정황 등 변론에 나타난 모든 양형조건 및 대법원 양형 위원회 제정 양형기준의 권고 형량 범위 ◈ 법률상 처단형의 범위: 징역 1년 6월 ~ 15년 ◈ 양형기준상 권고 형의 범위 [ 유형의 결정] 공무집행 방해범죄 > 특수 공무 방 해치사상 > 제 1 유형( 특수 공무 방해 치상) [ 특별 양형 인자] 감경요소: 처벌 불원 [ 권고 영역 및 권고 형의 범위] 감경영역, 징역 1년 6월 ~ 3년 , 제 1 심과 비교하여 양형의 조건에 변화가 없고 제 1 심의 양형이 재량의 합리적인 범위를 벗어나지 아니하는 경우에는 이를 존중함이...