The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is unreasonable because the sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (two years and six months of imprisonment, four years of suspended execution, and 80 hours of social service) is too uneasible.

2. The crime of this case is an injury to a police officer who was dispatched by the defendant to the 112 report of the master, and performed legitimate duties, and is driving under the influence of alcohol with 0.180% alcohol during the course of escape after the crime of this case. The crime of this case is committed under the influence of alcohol during the course of escape, and its nature and method of crime is very poor, and the crime of obstructing the driving of alcohol or the performance of official duties by the police officer is directly connected to the life and safety of citizens, and thus strict punishment is required.

On the other hand, the fact that the defendant recognizes the crimes of this case as substitute and reflects the wrongness, the fact that the victimized police officer does not want the punishment against the defendant under an agreement with the victimized police officer, and that there is no record of criminal punishment exceeding the fine, etc. are favorable to the defendant.

위와 같은 사정들과 그 밖에 피고인의 나이, 성 행, 환경, 범행의 동기, 수단과 결과, 범행 후의 정황 등 변론에 나타난 모든 양형조건 및 대법원 양형 위원회 제정 양형기준의 권고 형량 범위 ◈ 처단형의 범위: 징역 1년 6월 ~ 15년 6월 ◈ 양형기준의 적용 기본범죄: 특수 공무집행 방해 치상죄 [ 유형의 결정] 공무집행 방해범죄, 특수 공무 방 해치사상, 제 1 유형( 특수 공무 방해 치상) [ 특별 양형 인자] 감경요소: 처벌 불원 [ 권고 형의 범위] 징역 1년 6월 ~ 3년( 감경영역) 도로 교통법위반( 음주 운전) 죄는 양형기준이 설정되어 있지 아니 함 다수범죄 처리기준의 적용: 징역 1년 6월 이상( 양형기준이 설정된 범죄와 양형기준이 설정되지 아니한 범죄가 형법 제 37 조 전단의 경합범 관계에 있으므로, 양형기준이 설정된...