1. The Defendant: (a) with respect to the Plaintiffs, among the Daegu Dong-gu D Forest land of 7,845 square meters;

(a) An indication of the results of the cadastral status survey set forth in Appendix 1.

1. Basic facts

A. On September 28, 1979, on the 7,845 square meters of the Daegu-gu dong-gu D Forest (hereinafter “the instant forest”), a share transfer registration for E, F, G, H, and I had been made on September 28, 1979 with respect to each of the instant forest right holders.

B. The I died on September 7, 2013, and the I’s property was jointly inherited at the respective ratios of 3/11 of the wifeJ and the Plaintiff A, K, L, and M, each of whose children are children, respectively.

C.F died on February 3, 1993, and F’s property was jointly inherited by wife N 3/7, Plaintiff B andO, who are children, at each of 2/7.

As N dies, the plaintiff B andO jointly inherited the N's property at the rate of one-half of each of them.

Around May 3, 2012, the Defendant shall also install a tombstone in the attached Form 1 cadastral status survey of the instant forest and land in the part of 125 square meters in the cemetery possession line, each of the instant tombstones in the attached Table 2 “1” and “2” (hereinafter “instant tombstones”), attached Table 2, attached Table 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 10, and 3, attached Table 2, attached Table 11, 12, 13, 14, and 11, attached Table 2, attached Table 2, attached Table 15, attached Table 2, “15,” and attached Table 16, attached Table 2, attached Table 2, and each of the instant tombstones in sequence, and manage the instant tombstones in the part of each of the instant forest and land, attached Table 2, attached Table 17, 19, 20, 21, 223, and 27.

【Ground of recognition】 In the absence of dispute, Gap evidence 1, Gap evidence 3-2, Gap evidence 1-7, 10, 13, 16, 19, 22, and 23, the purport of the whole pleadings and arguments

2. According to the above facts of the determination on the cause of the claim, the net I and F are presumed to be the right holder of each of the forest land of this case by the presumption of the registration, and the Plaintiff A succeeds to the net I’s share in the ratio of 2/11, while the Plaintiff B succeeds to the net F’s share in the ratio of 1/2.