A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for four years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

"2018 Gohap102"

1. On August 28, 2018, the Defendant: (a) around 15:30 on the ground that, under the influence of alcohol in the “D” operated by the Victim C, the Defendant: (b) expressed a bath to “2,000 foot wald so as to be wald; (c) she refused to purchase credit on the part of the victim; and (d) requested the victim to purchase credit; and (e) the victim refused to purchase credit on the part of the victim; and (e) made it impossible for the customer to enter the 25 minutes of the disturbance by avoiding the disturbance.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the business of burial of the victim by force.

2. On August 28, 2018, the Defendant engaged in obstruction of performance of official duties: (a) around 15:50, at the places indicated in the foregoing paragraph (1); (b) around 15:50; and (c) around 201, the slope F, who was dispatched to the site after having received a report on the act of disturbance, such as paragraph (1), was tightly divided to ask the Defendant about his personal information, etc.; (b) sold the shoulder of the said F once by drinking, and carried the shoulder of the F by hand.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning 112 reporting processing duties.

"2018 Gohap99"

3. On October 23, 2018, from around 23:33 to 23:50 the same day, the Defendant interfered with the business of the victim’s main shop within the “I” point of “I” located in G from around November 2018 to around 23:50 of the same day, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, went beyond the other customers, and interfered with the victim’s main shop business for about 17 minutes by avoiding the disturbance.

4. Around 07:40 on October 14, 2018, the Defendant: (a) committed an assault on the ground that the victim K (the age of 53) was unable to properly resolve the problem of the land in front of the housing site sales office located in theJ in the city of Won-si; (b) was frighting about 15 cm of the stone, which is a dangerous object in the land, to the victim.

5. The Defendant of special property damage, at around 17:00 on October 15, 201, was in danger of chemicalization and preparation in advance for the same reason as the foregoing paragraph 4 at the same place as that of the foregoing paragraph 4.