Text
1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On March 30, 2012, the Plaintiff completed the registration of ownership transfer based on sale on February 19, 2012, 2012, with respect to 998 square meters (hereinafter “instant real estate”).
B. On November 2, 2008, the Plaintiff registered as the representative of the Defendant (from B religious organization E to B religious organization C, its name was changed from October 11, 2013) and resided in the Defendant’s temple building. The Defendant used the instant real estate as its temple site, etc.
C. On June 10, 2014, the Plaintiff agreed to the following content by stating that “F, in a de facto marital relationship, was de facto, and was actually in a de facto marital relationship with the Defendant, issued the following agreements to F, and F, at the bottom of the agreement, was attached to all the relationship with the Plaintiff without any reason.”
(The following is: (a) the text of the agreement delivered by the Plaintiff to F is written as it is; (b) the name of the Plaintiff or F is written as Plaintiff or F; (c) the said agreement is written as Plaintiff or F; and (d) the amount that the F of the agreement may give to the Plaintiff is KRW 100 million; and (c) the said amount includes KRW 30 million,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000, out of the said amount, and KRW 10,000,000,000.
Gice lent money 2,00,000 won and 80,000 won for the plaintiff.
The plaintiff Han Han-gu et al. 3,000 won F shall be fully paid.
b. The name of the Plaintiff will be transferred at the same time.
F. F. F. F. F. F. F.C.
(b) do not raise any objection without having any civil or criminal responsibility in both Section C and F;
Directors' Day: October 10
D. On August 8, 2014, the Plaintiff entered into a sales contract to sell the instant real estate amounting to KRW 64 million between the Defendant and the Defendant, and completed the registration of ownership transfer on August 11, 2014 by the Changwon District Court Seowon District Court Decision No. 45279.
In this case, "the above sales contract" is the case.