logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2018.11.30 2018고단2168
협박등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defluence: (a) on September 27, 2018, the Defendant sent to the Defendant for the handling of the reported case 112 on the roads front of the said main shop C, the owner of the said main shop D, etc., in the Gun, the Defendant: (b) on the roads front of the said main shop C; (c) on September 27, 2018; and (d) on the part of the victim F, the circumstances leading to the E unit in the police station E unit, “I am flue, flue,

A Dogdogian sound, Dogn Dogn Dogn Dogn Dogn Dogn Dogn

Chewing ...."Publicly insulting the victim by speaking in a large sound.

2. On September 28, 2018, the Defendant damaged the goods used by public offices in order to repair costs of KRW 70,000 by opening a string-off 15, which was attached to the wall of the above detention room, on the ground that the Defendant was arrested and detained in the investigation of the Cheongju-gu Seoul Police Station and the investigation of the Cheongju-gu Police Station located in the 15-gil-ro, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, 236, and the arrest of him/her from the 4-ho room in the detention room.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made in relation to F, D, and G;

1. Complaint;

1. Reporting on the arrest of the occurrence of the case, reporting on investigation (damage to public goods), investigation reports (a written estimate attached to accelerators related to damage to public goods), and preparation of recording records;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs damaging public goods;

1. Article 311 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Articles 311 and 141 (1) of the Criminal Act of the choice of punishment, and fines;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment for a violation of business affairs at the Cheongju District Court on May 24, 2018 and the judgment became final and conclusive on June 1, 2018, and led to each of the instant crimes during the suspended execution period, and that the criminal acts in the same state as the same history were repeated.

However, it seems that the defendant is against the defendant and the damage caused by the crime is all serious.

It is difficult to see, and the age, sex, intelligence, and environment of the defendant.

arrow