logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 밀양지원 2017.06.08 2017고단134
마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant is not a narcotics handler.

1. On April 8, 2017, the Defendant, who violated the Narcotics Control Act (flavoring), administered a drug by mixing the Mept A, a local mental medicine, with water and mix approximately 0.05 g of Mept A, 102, 303, 102, and 303, of the apartment of 102, 102, and 303, 201.

2. On April 8, 2017, at around 23:40, the Defendant: (a) 503 apartment buildings, such as the foregoing paragraph (1) 503; (b) and (c) considered that there were voices of the wife sent out after the administration of Mepters, such as the foregoing paragraph (1) 503; (c) followed the boxes accumulated in front of the entrance; and (d) subsequently, the victim D residing in the foregoing 503 was shot of the human body, and invaded the victim’s residence by opening the door door to the 503 suspender by using the gap thereof.

3. On April 9, 2017, the Defendant who damaged public goods: (a) opened a wooden board installed on the wall surface of one unit in the detention room, which is a case for public goods, in his/her hand, on the ground that the crime referred to in the above paragraph (2) was committed and was arrested and detained in flagrant offender; (b) opened the buffer cunch paper, finishing paper and length board installed on the wall of the protection detention room at around 10:40 on the same day; and (c) opened the toilets in the detention room at around 20:20 on the same day on the same day, in which the Defendant damaged public goods by opening the toilets, electric wires, and ceiling board installed in the detention room at the detention room at the detention room at around 20:20 on the same day so that approximately 400,000 won for repair costs would be damaged.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Each statement of E and F;

1. Each response to a request for appraisal;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to a detention room CCTV photographe;

1. Article 60(1)2, Article 4(1) and Article 2 subparag. 3(b) of the Act on the Selection and Management of Narcotics, Etc. (which means the administration of a psychotropic medicine) on criminal facts, Article 319(1) of the Criminal Act (which means intrusion upon residence) and Article 141(1) of the Criminal Act (which means damage to public goods).

arrow